Hillsboro is not anything of what it is cracked up to be! Beware of entirely false claims about the quality of the education. We have a child at Hume-Fogg, and the writer who said the 2 programs are comparable is completely mistaken. All classes at Hume-Fogg are honors classes. At Hillsboro, math in 9th and 10th grade is almost non-existent, as many IB students were placed in 9th and 10th grade classes with students who can barely do basic math, slowing the progress to a very slow crawl for students actually ready for Algebra 1. Algebra II was a joke. English teachers and a few Social Studies teachers are about the only bright spots. Science is not very good. Some lax teachers regularly have subs at the rate of 1 out of 3 classes per week; the administration does not care, and the students miss a ton of valuable instruction time, and chat for an hour and a half. Spanish Dept. is very good. All French classes are at a low level of beginning, elementary French, even French III and IV. The PTO is top-notch and working very hard; commendable, dedicated parents are doing an extremely difficult job with grace. With upgraded teachers at all levels, this could be a very good school. The worst setback came with the transfer out of Mary Catherine Bradshaw. The IB Programme lost high-rated teachers and does not have funding to upgrade them while it competes with the demands of the Academies. In all grades the teachers will never be of the caliber of MLK or Hume-Fogg; and, the Programme is not large enough to sustain that.
Forget 9th and 10th grade except for English. Send your kid somewhere else! Unless your child is self-motivated to get ahead on their own (and they would do well anywhere, so they are not to Hillsboro's credit), and those are the stars of Hillsboro, he/she will not be competitive in college and have a rude awakening that their A's and B's earned at Hillsboro were C's and D's and possibly F's elsewhere, and we have learned that lesson the hard way.