I filed a small claim against Ms Lier, whose dog punctured me. Ms Lier moved away and intend to avoid me. I googled and spoke to several registered process servers. Then after reading the reviews online, I decided to go with Tracy --Creative Investigations. My English is not good. Tracy is very professional and patient, which made our communication smooth. The process of server proved difficult for there is no much information associate with Ms lier in the database. In the first week, several times of locating failed. I was little depressed, but Tracy was not. She has a very strong believe " She can find every one". Yes, she can. In the second week, after jumping a couple of hoops, she got her and served the paper in the smart way.
In addition of the proof of service, Tray sent me a 3 pages of DECLARE OF TRACY IN SPPORT OF PROOF OF SERVICE.
The following is some sentences in the "DECLARE"
On December 19, 2013, the Investigator returned to the property located at XXXX at 6:45 A.M. A discreet surveillance position was secured. At 7:25 A.M., the female in her 40's, who previously identified herself as the Subject's mother at the XXX residence, exited the house and lit a cigarette. Minutes later, she returned inside. At 8:25 A.M., the female who closed the blinds on the December 16th service attempt exited the residence attired in a black T-Shirt and pajama bottoms. She opened the garage door and peered inside. The Subject quickly turned when she heard the Investigators car door close and stared intently at the Investigator as she approached the residence. The Investigator initially gave the appearance that she was walking past the Subject's residence which allowed the Subject to return her focus to the contents of the garage. The Investigator called out to the Subject by name and she turned and looked at the Investigator with no hesitation. The Investigator removed the court papers from her inside jacket pocket and the Subject stated “I'm not xxx.” The Investigator asked for her name and she replied “I'm xxx's cousin.” At the same time the female, previously identified as the Subject's mother, exited the residence holding an unlit cigarette and unaware of the reason for the visit. The Investigator quickly smiled at the woman and stated “I found xxx.” The Subject's mother smiled back and stated “Oh good.” The Investigator extended the papers for the Subject to take as she turned to her mother in an apparent attempt to continue the ruse. The Subject stated “Mom, do you know where xxx is?” The Subject's mother, caught on quickly and played along. She stated “xxx… I don't know no xxx.”
*It should be noted that the Subject, who identified herself as 'xxx's cousin' called the woman who had previously identified herself to the Investigator as the Subject's mother “Mom.”. The Investigator can attest that the woman served was in fact xxx based on a fitting description and the impossibility that the woman she called “Mom” should have logistically been her aunt. The Investigator informed the Subject that she was being served court papers and placed the papers on the property as allowed by California Law. The Investigator departed the vicinity of the property without incident and secured a picture of the Subject standing with her mother in the driveway during her departure.
What do you think? Yes, this is Tracy. A smart and brave investigator. Highly recommend!